<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A big list of programming languages</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.programming4scientists.com/2008/08/22/a-big-list-of-programming-languages/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.programming4scientists.com/2008/08/22/a-big-list-of-programming-languages/</link>
	<description>Software development wisdom and common-sense for the scientist-programmer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 19:05:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Design Issues in Modern Programming Languages (Modern Programlama Dillerindeki Tasarım Sorunları) &#124; Ahmet Alp Balkan : Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.programming4scientists.com/2008/08/22/a-big-list-of-programming-languages/comment-page-1/#comment-477</link>
		<dc:creator>Design Issues in Modern Programming Languages (Modern Programlama Dillerindeki Tasarım Sorunları) &#124; Ahmet Alp Balkan : Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 19:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.programming4scientists.com/?p=46#comment-477</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;A big list of programming languages&#8220;, Programming for Scientists, retrieved on Dec 20, 2009.  Bunu okuyanın bunları da okuyası gelebilir:Digg + Stumbleupon = DIGGSTR!User Data Privacy on Web Sites (Web Sitelerinde Kullanıcı Verilerinin Gizliliği)Takip Ettiğim Development BloglarıI/O Brush: MIT Media Labs&#8217;tan Bir HarikaWindows Vista Home Premium &#8211; Basic Edition Nasıl İngilizce Yapılır? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;A big list of programming languages&#8220;, Programming for Scientists, retrieved on Dec 20, 2009.  Bunu okuyanın bunları da okuyası gelebilir:Digg + Stumbleupon = DIGGSTR!User Data Privacy on Web Sites (Web Sitelerinde Kullanıcı Verilerinin Gizliliği)Takip Ettiğim Development BloglarıI/O Brush: MIT Media Labs&#8217;tan Bir HarikaWindows Vista Home Premium &#8211; Basic Edition Nasıl İngilizce Yapılır? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G. Gilbert Vaughan</title>
		<link>http://www.programming4scientists.com/2008/08/22/a-big-list-of-programming-languages/comment-page-1/#comment-467</link>
		<dc:creator>G. Gilbert Vaughan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 12:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.programming4scientists.com/?p=46#comment-467</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m  half-heartedly looking  for a language just like Quick Basic - or qB45 - but which can make more use of the graphics card (640x480, 16 colour limit currently), and/or makes use of the sea of &quot;Windows&quot; RAM, rather than just the 640k of &quot;base memory&quot;.   
   Just (merely !) a &quot;qB45&quot; which wasn&#039;t knobbled in graphics by XP o/s, would be a great leap forward.   
   Oh father hear my prayer for I am quite useful with it !!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m  half-heartedly looking  for a language just like Quick Basic &#8211; or qB45 &#8211; but which can make more use of the graphics card (640&#215;480, 16 colour limit currently), and/or makes use of the sea of &#8220;Windows&#8221; RAM, rather than just the 640k of &#8220;base memory&#8221;.<br />
   Just (merely !) a &#8220;qB45&#8243; which wasn&#8217;t knobbled in graphics by XP o/s, would be a great leap forward.<br />
   Oh father hear my prayer for I am quite useful with it !!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ritika</title>
		<link>http://www.programming4scientists.com/2008/08/22/a-big-list-of-programming-languages/comment-page-1/#comment-88</link>
		<dc:creator>ritika</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 06:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.programming4scientists.com/?p=46#comment-88</guid>
		<description>what is the use of various built in functions un the programming language BASIC</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what is the use of various built in functions un the programming language BASIC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Harrop</title>
		<link>http://www.programming4scientists.com/2008/08/22/a-big-list-of-programming-languages/comment-page-1/#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Harrop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 15:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.programming4scientists.com/?p=46#comment-87</guid>
		<description>OCaml and F# are both much more heavily used by scientists than many of the languages on your list (e.g. IDL, Lisp, Perl and Shell). Their combination of high performance and interactivity makes them ideal for scientific computing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OCaml and F# are both much more heavily used by scientists than many of the languages on your list (e.g. IDL, Lisp, Perl and Shell). Their combination of high performance and interactivity makes them ideal for scientific computing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Lianoglou</title>
		<link>http://www.programming4scientists.com/2008/08/22/a-big-list-of-programming-languages/comment-page-1/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Lianoglou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 15:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.programming4scientists.com/?p=46#comment-31</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s worth mentioning under the Python section that there exists libraries that make its use very amenable to scientific programming.

I&#039;m specifically talking about numpy, scipy, and matplotlib (and IPython).

NumPy is a library that makes working w/ arrays pretty much as easy as MATLAB.

SciPy is a library that is based on numpy and adds lots of stuff handy for scientific programming.

Both are available through: http://scipy.org

Matplotlib is a very capable plotting library that makes interacting/viewing your data quite easy (like in MATLAB/R). It is available on sourceforge: http://matplotlib.sf.net

Lastly, IPython is the python interactive  shell on steroids. It&#039;s a must have when interacting with your program/data as you write it:

http://ipython.scipy.org/moin/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s worth mentioning under the Python section that there exists libraries that make its use very amenable to scientific programming.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m specifically talking about numpy, scipy, and matplotlib (and IPython).</p>
<p>NumPy is a library that makes working w/ arrays pretty much as easy as MATLAB.</p>
<p>SciPy is a library that is based on numpy and adds lots of stuff handy for scientific programming.</p>
<p>Both are available through: <a href="http://scipy.org" rel="nofollow">http://scipy.org</a></p>
<p>Matplotlib is a very capable plotting library that makes interacting/viewing your data quite easy (like in MATLAB/R). It is available on sourceforge: <a href="http://matplotlib.sf.net" rel="nofollow">http://matplotlib.sf.net</a></p>
<p>Lastly, IPython is the python interactive  shell on steroids. It&#8217;s a must have when interacting with your program/data as you write it:</p>
<p><a href="http://ipython.scipy.org/moin/" rel="nofollow">http://ipython.scipy.org/moin/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
